What Every Nigerian Board Should Know About Shareholders' Agreements in 2026

What Every Nigerian Board Should Know About Shareholders’ Agreements in 2026

A poorly drafted shareholders’ agreement is a time bomb waiting to happen and we have seen it happen in boardrooms across ownership disputes, deadlocked decisions and exits gone wrong. Not because the business failed but because the legal foundation was not built to last. Over time, the patterns we see are remarkably consistent: agreements drafted on templates, never reviewed after signing, and completely inadequate for the company that now exists. This article addresses the clauses that matter and the questions every board should be able to answer about the agreement that governs their company.

1. Pre-Emption Rights: Who Gets the First Right to Buy?
Pre-emption rights give existing shareholders the first opportunity to acquire shares before they can be sold to a third party. Without them or with poorly drafted versions, a shareholder can sell to anyone, including a competitor or simply someone the remaining shareholders would never have chosen.
The critical questions your agreement must answer are: What triggers the pre-emption obligation? Is it any proposed transfer or only certain categories? What is the valuation mechanism – a price agreed between the parties, an independent valuation or a formula? How long does the pre-emption window last? What happens if the pre-emption price is disputed?
An agreement that is silent or ambiguous on these points will fail at the exact moment it is most needed especially when a shareholder wants to exit the company.

2. Drag-Along Provisions: Can the Majority Force an Exit?
A drag-along clause allows a majority shareholder or a specified percentage of shareholders acting together to compel all other shareholders to sell their shares on the same terms in a company sale. The purpose is to allow a majority to execute a clean exit without a minority holdout blocking an otherwise agreed transaction. Without a drag-along, a minority shareholder can derail an acquisition by simply refusing to sell.

Regulatory Compliance Strategies for Navigating Cybersecurity Risks and Threats in Nigeria

Regulatory Compliance Strategies for Navigating Cybersecurity Risks and Threats in Nigeria

In today’s increasingly digital environment, cybersecurity has become a critical issue for organizations across the globe, including Nigeria. As organizations continue to rely heavily on digital systems and infrastructures for communication, financial transactions, data storage, and operational processes, they are becoming increasingly vulnerable to cyberthreats and breaches such as data theft, ransomware attacks, phishing schemes, and unauthorized system access. These threats not only expose companies to financial losses but can also damage corporate reputation, disrupt business operations, and result in regulatory penalties. In Nigeria, several regulatory frameworks such as the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023 and other sector specific compliance regulations place increasing obligations on companies to protect and safeguard sensitive information and implement effective cybersecurity measures.

Goldsmiths Solicitors – Legal Recap for the Year 2025

2025 was a very exciting year and saw significant changes in Nigeria’s legal and regulatory landscape. Series of laws were enacted by the National Assembly and regulatory guidelines were also issued by regulators including the Central Bank of Nigeria, Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, the Nigerian Communications Commission, etc. There were also some important judicial decisions from the courts in Nigeria which shaped the legal and regulatory space in the country. This recap is divided into four parts representing the four quarters of the year, highlighting what we think are the most impactful laws and regulations, reforms, and judicial decisions in 2025.

Contracting in the Digital Finance Ecosystem: How to Manage Legal Risks in Nigerian FinTech Partnerships

The emergence and continued growth of Financial Technology (FinTech) companies in the Nigerian financial services sector has redefined how financial services are delivered, with technology driven solutions that enable faster payments, lending and wealth management. These innovations often lead to complex collaborations between FinTech startups, traditional banks and third-party service providers. These partnerships may inevitably expose the parties to legal and regulatory risks if not properly managed.

A Guide on Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Finance Compliance for Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions in Nigeria

A Guide on Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Finance Compliance for Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions in Nigeria

Money laundering and terrorist financing are major threats to national and global security, and Nigeria is no exception. Under Section 18(2) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022 (MLPPA), money laundering is defined as the act of concealing, disguising, converting, transferring, or controlling funds or property, knowing they are proceeds of an unlawful act. Terrorist financing on the other hand, refers to the provision of funds or financial support to individuals or groups to enable them commit acts of terrorism.

Overregulation of FinTechs in Nigeria: Myth or Reality

In the last few years, the Nigerian Financial Technology (FinTech) space has witnessed exponential growth and has attracted both local and international investors. Nigeria is home to some unicorns especially in the payments segments of the financial services sector. Like in most jurisdictions, the regulators appear to be playing ‘catch up’ with FinTechs and it has been said that there appears to be an over regulation of FinTechs in Nigeria.