On 7 April 2026, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) announced the coming into effect of new rules on the Bank Verification Number (BVN) system from 1st May 2026. The new rules have been implemented to fight against fraud, enhance identity management and secure Nigeria’s growing digital banking space, resulting in new methods for account holders to manage and access information linked to their BVN.
The new policy came in the wake of numerous security concerns surrounding SIM swap fraud, identity theft and access to financial accounts without authorisation. With over 68.59 million users enrolled in the BVN system in 2026, the system plays a pivotal role in the security of the Nigerian financial sector.
Every week, we hear a story about a Nigerian business owner who has just discovered that someone else has registered their brand name as a trademark. Or that the logo their designer created is legally owned by the designer, not the business. Or that the technology they licensed from a foreign company cannot be enforced because it was never registered with NOTAP.
In every case, the business owner believed they were protected. They registered their business name with the Corporate Affairs Commission. They had a contract with their designer where they signed a license agreement but none of that was enough. And the cost of fixing it where feasible is always higher than the cost of getting it right in the first place.
On World IP Day, this article explains what it actually takes to protect a brand and its intellectual property in Nigeria in 2026.
Earth Day is a global reminder that environmental responsibility is no longer an ethical or reputational concern for businesses, it is a commercial one. For Nigerian businesses seeking international investment, DFI financing, or partnerships with multinational corporates, environmental compliance has become a fundamental prerequisite. For businesses in sectors with huge physical or operational footprints, it is a regulatory obligation backed by meaningful enforcement powers.
There is no loan facility stronger than the security that underlies it. Any bank that doesn’t properly secure its assets is not a secured creditor. And a borrower that does not understand its perfection obligations might find that its representations to its lender were false. These are five security perfection mistakes we see often and every party involved in a Nigerian credit transaction needs to know about them.
There is no loan facility stronger than the security that underlies it. Any bank that doesn’t properly secure its assets is not a secured creditor. And a borrower that does not understand its perfection obligations might find that its representations to its lender were false. These are five security perfection mistakes we see often and every party involved in a Nigerian credit transaction needs to know about them.
Most FinTech founders are aware they need a Central Bank of Nigeria license. But very few know which one to apply for – and the difference between applying for the wrong license and the right one is huge. A rejected application, wasted time, and regulatory exposure – and sometimes even a breach of existing commitments to clients and investors – are all examples of wasted time and regulatory exposure.
And in 2026, the revised payments framework makes the distinctions between license categories easier to understand and the consequences of operating in the wrong category more severe. Here are the three most commonly confused license categories for Nigerian FinTechs and the key questions to ask when choosing one.
Your product is validated, you have end users, your revenue is growing, and your team is getting bigger. And then it stops, and the founders can not understand why. This does not happen because the market changes or because the product fails. It’s because legal and structural foundations were built for a startup, and nobody updated the structures for a growing company. Every day, we see these problems in growth-stage Nigerian businesses, but these five are the most consistent, and we fix each one.
A poorly drafted shareholders’ agreement is a time bomb waiting to happen and we have seen it happen in boardrooms across ownership disputes, deadlocked decisions and exits gone wrong. Not because the business failed but because the legal foundation was not built to last. Over time, the patterns we see are remarkably consistent: agreements drafted on templates, never reviewed after signing, and completely inadequate for the company that now exists. This article addresses the clauses that matter and the questions every board should be able to answer about the agreement that governs their company.
1. Pre-Emption Rights: Who Gets the First Right to Buy?
Pre-emption rights give existing shareholders the first opportunity to acquire shares before they can be sold to a third party. Without them or with poorly drafted versions, a shareholder can sell to anyone, including a competitor or simply someone the remaining shareholders would never have chosen.
The critical questions your agreement must answer are: What triggers the pre-emption obligation? Is it any proposed transfer or only certain categories? What is the valuation mechanism – a price agreed between the parties, an independent valuation or a formula? How long does the pre-emption window last? What happens if the pre-emption price is disputed?
An agreement that is silent or ambiguous on these points will fail at the exact moment it is most needed especially when a shareholder wants to exit the company.
2. Drag-Along Provisions: Can the Majority Force an Exit?
A drag-along clause allows a majority shareholder or a specified percentage of shareholders acting together to compel all other shareholders to sell their shares on the same terms in a company sale. The purpose is to allow a majority to execute a clean exit without a minority holdout blocking an otherwise agreed transaction. Without a drag-along, a minority shareholder can derail an acquisition by simply refusing to sell.
In today’s increasingly digital environment, cybersecurity has become a critical issue for organizations across the globe, including Nigeria. As organizations continue to rely heavily on digital systems and infrastructures for communication, financial transactions, data storage, and operational processes, they are becoming increasingly vulnerable to cyberthreats and breaches such as data theft, ransomware attacks, phishing schemes, and unauthorized system access. These threats not only expose companies to financial losses but can also damage corporate reputation, disrupt business operations, and result in regulatory penalties. In Nigeria, several regulatory frameworks such as the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023 and other sector specific compliance regulations place increasing obligations on companies to protect and safeguard sensitive information and implement effective cybersecurity measures.
The Nigerian telecommunication sector has continued to experience exponential growth by attracting interests from local and international investors. With a teeming youth population, increase in remote work, online streaming, Nigeria presents immense opportunity for investments in the telecommunication sector especially the provision of internet services.
An Internet Service Provider (ISP) is a company that provides access to the internet through various technologies including fibre-optics, satellite and cable, to individuals and organisations and may also provide other related services such as web hosting, etc.
